<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Similarity and Difference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/29/similarity-and-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/04/29/similarity-and-difference/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:04:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Revolution at Ron Pisaturo&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/04/29/similarity-and-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-2577</link>
		<dc:creator>Revolution at Ron Pisaturo&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=379#comment-2577</guid>
		<description>[...] lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to defy a government that is changing America into a socialist/fascist/statist society? If Iranians can defy the Iranian dictators, if Estonians can stand up to the Soviets, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to defy a government that is changing America into a socialist/fascist/statist society? If Iranians can defy the Iranian dictators, if Estonians can stand up to the Soviets, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Grossman</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/04/29/similarity-and-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Grossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=379#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>&gt;Now you perceive the first two sticks as similar to each other and different from the third.

Tell nominalists that a small circle and a big circle are different, thus they cannot both be circles. The obvious absurdity will encourage honest philosophers to consider, if only implicitly, ranges of measurement. Then they may consider Rand&#039;s theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Now you perceive the first two sticks as similar to each other and different from the third.</p>
<p>Tell nominalists that a small circle and a big circle are different, thus they cannot both be circles. The obvious absurdity will encourage honest philosophers to consider, if only implicitly, ranges of measurement. Then they may consider Rand&#8217;s theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pisaturo</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/04/29/similarity-and-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pisaturo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=379#comment-896</guid>
		<description>First off, it’s clear that ‘Right’ and ‘Left’ are not the best words for the extremes of a political spectrum. Better words are ‘Freedom’ and ‘Coercion’. Ayn Rand defines ‘freedom’ as “the absence of physical coercion.”(&lt;em&gt;Capitalism the Unknown Ideal&lt;/em&gt;, p. 46, cited in &lt;em&gt;Glossary of Objectivist Definitions&lt;/em&gt;, edited by Allison T. Kunze and Jean Moroney.) I think a decent definition of ‘coercion’ is ‘the initiation of force’.

In accordance with those extremes, the political spectrum itself would be the degree to which individuals in a society are free from force initiated either by government or non-government individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, it’s clear that ‘Right’ and ‘Left’ are not the best words for the extremes of a political spectrum. Better words are ‘Freedom’ and ‘Coercion’. Ayn Rand defines ‘freedom’ as “the absence of physical coercion.”(<em>Capitalism the Unknown Ideal</em>, p. 46, cited in <em>Glossary of Objectivist Definitions</em>, edited by Allison T. Kunze and Jean Moroney.) I think a decent definition of ‘coercion’ is ‘the initiation of force’.</p>
<p>In accordance with those extremes, the political spectrum itself would be the degree to which individuals in a society are free from force initiated either by government or non-government individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgess Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/04/29/similarity-and-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgess Laughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=379#comment-810</guid>
		<description>You have covered a lot of ground. You have identified a major confusion (if not dishonesty) about classifying things, and you have identified the philosophical roots of Right vs. Left.

How would you define Right and Left?

What I am looking for is a concise -- genus and differentia -- definition of each that is useful in discussions with a broad audience. I hope you are open to discussion on this. I have more questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have covered a lot of ground. You have identified a major confusion (if not dishonesty) about classifying things, and you have identified the philosophical roots of Right vs. Left.</p>
<p>How would you define Right and Left?</p>
<p>What I am looking for is a concise &#8212; genus and differentia &#8212; definition of each that is useful in discussions with a broad audience. I hope you are open to discussion on this. I have more questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

