<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Paper Published in Philosophy of Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:04:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: My Refutation of the Doomsday Argument at Ron Pisaturo&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>My Refutation of the Doomsday Argument at Ron Pisaturo&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>[...] has been more than a month since my paper, “Past Longevity as Evidence for the Future,” appeared in Philosophy of Science. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been more than a month since my paper, “Past Longevity as Evidence for the Future,” appeared in Philosophy of Science. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johann Gevers</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Johann Gevers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>Ron

Congratulations! I second Burgess Laughlin&#039;s comment that 

&quot;Persistence is a virtue. Those who are not writers or editors or publishers do not understand the enormous amount of time required to think, research, organize, write, edit, submit to criticism, proofread, and publish.&quot;

It took Ayn Rand two years of intense work to complete Galt&#039;s speech--about 13 days per page! Highly creative work that breaks new ground and solves difficult problems in original ways is very time-consuming even for the greatest geniuses. Stephen Wolfram&#039;s principle of computational irreducibility goes some way towards explaining why.

The problems you are interested in are of the first order of importance. I hope you find a way to continue your research soon.

Best

Johann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron</p>
<p>Congratulations! I second Burgess Laughlin&#8217;s comment that </p>
<p>&#8220;Persistence is a virtue. Those who are not writers or editors or publishers do not understand the enormous amount of time required to think, research, organize, write, edit, submit to criticism, proofread, and publish.&#8221;</p>
<p>It took Ayn Rand two years of intense work to complete Galt&#8217;s speech&#8211;about 13 days per page! Highly creative work that breaks new ground and solves difficult problems in original ways is very time-consuming even for the greatest geniuses. Stephen Wolfram&#8217;s principle of computational irreducibility goes some way towards explaining why.</p>
<p>The problems you are interested in are of the first order of importance. I hope you find a way to continue your research soon.</p>
<p>Best</p>
<p>Johann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogan</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>Congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Lindeskog</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Lindeskog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>Ron,

Congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron,</p>
<p>Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Jamieson</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Jamieson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>Excellent, I&#039;d love to read the article! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, I&#8217;d love to read the article! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Deutsch</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Deutsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>Right on, Ron!! Congratulations! Can&#039;t wait to read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Ron!! Congratulations! Can&#8217;t wait to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hurwitz</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hurwitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Ron!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Ron!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgess Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgess Laughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>In 1671, John Locke and a few friends met to discuss the ethical, religious, and political problems of their turbulent time. They made little progress. Locke realized that they had to go deeper, down to the roots, down to understanding what man can know and what his limits are. He set off to find answers. About 18 years later, he published the first edition of &lt;i&gt;An Essay Concerning Human Understanding&lt;/i&gt;. When Locke died in 1704, he was working on a fifth edition of his expanded work, one of the most influential works on epistemology of modern times.

Persistence is a virtue.

Those who are not writers or editors or publishers do not understand the enormous amount of time required to think, research, organize, write, edit, submit to criticism, proofread, and publish.

Congratulations on having your work published.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1671, John Locke and a few friends met to discuss the ethical, religious, and political problems of their turbulent time. They made little progress. Locke realized that they had to go deeper, down to the roots, down to understanding what man can know and what his limits are. He set off to find answers. About 18 years later, he published the first edition of <i>An Essay Concerning Human Understanding</i>. When Locke died in 1704, he was working on a fifth edition of his expanded work, one of the most influential works on epistemology of modern times.</p>
<p>Persistence is a virtue.</p>
<p>Those who are not writers or editors or publishers do not understand the enormous amount of time required to think, research, organize, write, edit, submit to criticism, proofread, and publish.</p>
<p>Congratulations on having your work published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott s</title>
		<link>http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/2009/05/20/my-paper-published-in-philosophy-of-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>scott s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronpisaturo.com/blog/?p=396#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>congratulations Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congratulations Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

