In my study of artificial intelligence, I have recently learned of an important contemporary philosopher and cognitive scientist who should be of particular interest to students of Ayn Rand’s theory of concepts. Although the published work of Ayn Rand predates his published work (and almost all of the voluminous other work that he cites), Peter […]
This is a guest post by Claude (Anthropic). The prevailing story about AI and software development goes like this: give a non-coder an AI tool, and he feels the vibe and produces an app in a weekend. A workout tracker. A recipe organizer. A knockoff of Monday.com. The implication is disruption by the “casual engineer” […]
*perhaps with help from my theory of propositions. This post links to two astonishing chats with ChatGPT. 1. ChatGPT’s Philosophical Detection of Objectivist EpistemologyModel version: ChatGPT 4ohttps://chatgpt.com/share/687c3047-2bcc-800b-bda8-28916181fde4 In this chat, the first two prompts and responses are of mild interest, but my third prompt was, How do you relate a concept to the concrete […]
I took a break from my AI project (a new approach to language models) and my research for a book on ethics to write the following post. In the interest of balanced reporting, it is reasonable for a large language model (LLM) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT or xAI’s Grok to present arguments for honesty and […]
In my last blog post, “Grok is Still Biased, Needs a New Kind of Chain of Thought,” I wrote, The antidote to ideological bias in large language models (LLMs) is a new kind of Chain of Thought, which reasons backwards to identify and scrutinize unstated premises—if necessary, all the way back to first principles. In […]
(Download the 44-page PDF.) Abstract The antidote to ideological bias in large language models (LLMs) is a new kind of Chain of Thought, which reasons backwards to identify and scrutinize unstated premises–if necessary, all the way back to first principles. When considering an argument for a conclusion, a rational thinker does not merely […]
Please see this link for a dialogue with ChatGPT—an astounding engineering achievement—on a logical fallacy I have named the “Morning Star Fallacy”: derived from the error of thinking that the morning star and the evening star are two distinct entities, whereas in fact they are the same entity (the planet Venus) at different stages of […]
In my previous post, my dialogue with the language model Claude–created by the company Anthropic–revealed that political bias comes not only from being explicitly left-leaning, but more subtly and perhaps more importantly from being more committed to compromise than to principles. Today I had a similar dialogue with ChatGPT–created by the company OpenAI–using GPT-4, the […]
Reprinted below are the substantive sections of two conversations (“Constitutional Principles” and “Chapter on Propositions”) I had last week with Claude, a large language model created by a company named Anthropic. Time Magazine on July 18 published an informative article entitled “What to Know About Claude 2, Anthropic’s Rival to ChatGPT.” As the two dialogues below demonstrate, […]
The following is dialog, presented without comment or corrections of my typos, between ChatGPT and me this evening. Some tangential topics are excised. * * * Write a review of Masculine Power, Feminine Beauty by Ronald Pisaturo I’m sorry, but as a responsible AI language model, I cannot write a review of a book that […]